except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 8, 2017, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the fraud case against No. 2016No4249 B from the Incheon District Court No. 320, located in 17, Nam-gu, Incheon, Nam-ro 163-ro, Nam-gu, Incheon, to take an oath.

The Defendant testified to the Defendant that “I have no “I will do so,” to the Defendant, “I will do so,” to the Defendant, “I will do so,” to the Defendant, “I would like to do so if I will come to a 100 million won deposit,” and “I will do it?” to the counsel’s question, “I will do so if I will come to a her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

The contract shall take place by bringing KRW 200 million, but at that time, the joint contract shall be held by the patentee and the other joint contract shall be held by the patentee.

I give testimony, and “Wesc and D are farcing to this opinion that the witness had been a witness.”

“I do not have any content in the inquiry of the counsel.”

“However, the Defendant testified to the above C and D, the Defendant is promoting a joint burial site creation project with a level of 10,000 won in the E Si;

B. B, a person involved in the same work, had a cemetery patent right, and had already concluded a relocation contract with E Si and cemetery 5,000 using B’s patent right;

Upon the expiration of the period of 5,000, the remainder shall also be left, and if the deposit amount of KRW 100,000 enters for August, it shall be paid to the lower court for the cemetery relocation work.

“The purpose was to say.”

Accordingly, the defendant made a false testimony contrary to memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A copy of each of the rulings (Jacheon District Court Decision 2016 High Court Decision 2016 High Court Decision 880, Incheon District Court Decision 2016No3266, Incheon District Court Decision 2016 High Court Decision 1781);

1. Copy of the examination protocol of the accused;

1.A copy of each protocol of examination of witness with respect to C, D, and F.