beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.09.21 2017고단620

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and nine months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 620 "

1. The fraud Defendant became aware of the victim’s participation in the first patrol force on January 2017, 2017, in the Internet portal site “(SNS)”, a social network service of the Internet portal site operated by the victim C.

On January 31, 2017, the Defendant: “Around January 15:39, 2017, the Defendant, while in office in Samsung C&T, managed the funds, and, as a consequence of the share operation force, tried to obtain a loan as security and make an investment in the operating states to the amount of KRW 1 billion; (b) would have B pay money by investing money in the operating states.

‘False speech' was made.

However, in fact, the Defendant invested in the state of operations or did not know related information, even if the Defendant received the investment from the injured party, it did not have the intent or ability to return the profit in return for the profit by investing in the shares, and did not have any particular occupation, and thus, intended to use the money from the injured party for the purpose of bond repayment and cost of living.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, was transferred to a new bank account in the name of the Defendant from the date of the victim to the same day under the name of the victim.

2. From February 2017 to March 29, 2017, the Defendant driven a Hpppon vehicle in the name of G without obtaining a driver’s license for a motor vehicle on both sides, such as a “F” restaurant, front of a cafeteria located in Gyeonggi-gun E, and without obtaining a driver’s license for a motor vehicle.

"2017 Highest 853"

1. The Defendant against the victim I, on December 7, 2016, posted a letter on the Internet K site, “gallon-gallon-gallon-gallon-gallon-gallon-gallon-gallon-gallon-gallon-galon-galon-galon-galon-galon-galon-galon-galon-galon-galon-galon-galon-galon-galon

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have a fishing market share in the water, so he did not have any damage.