2. The fact that the defendant's judgment on the grounds for appeal is against his own mistake and does not repeat again, and that the defendant does not have the same punishment power is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the prepaid mobile phone opened to the crime of this case was used for the crime of Bosing, and the Defendant was released from prison after having been sentenced to punishment for the crime of this case, and the Defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

In addition, in full view of the Defendant’s age, character, conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and all of the sentencing factors indicated in the instant records and pleadings, such as the circumstances after the crime was committed, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.