For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of accepting bribery money and valuables received as a policeman on July 2010 and on October 201, 2010 among the facts charged in the instant case.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on duties relation to bribery, quid pro quo, and the degree of proof for conviction in a criminal judgment.

Therefore, by the assent of all participating Justices, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.