협박등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
"2016 Highest 2240"
1. The Defendant, at around 17:00 on March 29, 2016, assaulted the victim on the ground that the victim C made a disadvantageous statement against the Defendant in relation to the case of the complaint within the investigation of the Yananananananannam Police Station in the south-dong Police Station located 6:73 times in South-dong, Chungcheongnam-dong, Chungcheongnam-dong, and the economic 1 team office, in which the victim C made a statement unfavorable to the Defendant in relation to the case of the complaint.
2. On May 23, 2014, from around 09:28 to around September 2014, the Defendant sent the victim’s explanation of the fact that the Defendant was denied at least seven times to the victim’s end, and sent the victim’s explanation to himself/herself that he/she used on his/her cell phone, on the ground that he/she took legal measures, and then threatened the victim, such as notifying him/her of harm and injury, as in the annexed list of crimes.
The defendant of "2017 Highest 849" is a space between the defendant and the victim F while taking an auction-related lecture in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D.
On July 5, 2009, the Defendant entered into an agreement with 46 victims, F, etc., to “to gather money and sell real estate and divide profits remaining after selling it,” and received KRW 467 million from the victims as real estate investment money. On November 5, 2009, the Defendant used the above funds as a successful bid for the Cheongju-si G commercial building and land (hereinafter “the instant real estate”) in a reasonable manner for Cheongju-si, and registered the transfer of ownership in the name of the Defendant around November 5, 2009, and managed the said real estate.
As seen above, the Defendant acquired funds from the victims and disposed of the instant real estate, and distributed profits therefrom. As such, the Defendant did not commit any act detrimental to the value of the instant real estate, such as setting up a collateral security on the instant real estate for personal use of funds.