When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

[2017 Highest 4762] The Defendant, E, and F: (a) received a request from G, the petitant of G, who was prosecuted for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. by the Goyang District Court on April 5, 2016 (No. 2016 highest 7655) to request that the G be sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor; (b) reported the I and the J to the police station of the J J for the purpose of being arrested; and (c) made a false investigation public service as if the G was informed of it through the author; and (d) made the relevant documents to be submitted to the court where G is pending.

On March 21, 2016, the Defendant, E, and F met H in the mutual infinite coffee shop near the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, in a square, H is a joint law for the investigation of drug offenders.

The public work of G is mainly conducted by E and A.

In stating, “E”, Defendant A shall be introduced to H, and “E shall first identify the records of the case and directly enter a high-class branch office to confirm the records of G and confirm the records of G, and shall work in any way.

Defendant A refers to “The fee is different for each case, but the fee is 10 million won to 15 million won.

“Along with the fact that the Plaintiff received KRW 300,00 from H as a public work expense of the said G in its place, from around that time to September 21, 2016, a total of KRW 1,375,000,000,000 from September 21, 2016, as indicated in the list of crimes.

As a result, the defendant, E, and F conspired to receive money and valuables, and dealt with related legal affairs such as reduction of punishment and preference in relation to G criminal litigation cases.

[2017 Highest 6655] On August 19, 2017, the Defendant committed assault against the victim on the part of the parking lot in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, Seoul-gu, with a view to this parking problem (28 years old). As a result, the Defendant took a look at the victim’s wife M, and took a bath for the Defendant’s wife M by hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. The first and second public trial records;