However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 12, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months and two years of suspension of execution for fraud in the Gwangju District Court's Netcheon Branch.

9.7 The above judgment was finalized.

1. On April 10, 2015, around April 10, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D, stating that “The Defendant would build a convalescent hospital and funeral ceremony in the E site at the time of leisure and operation of the inside and outside, and the victim D would change the amount of KRW 30 million by making an advance payment to reduce landscaping construction work at the construction site.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not purchase E land at the time of the above leisure, and did not have funds to purchase the land, and there was no funds to undertake the construction work, and even if he received advance payment from the injured party, even if he did not have an intention or ability to reduce the construction work at the convalescent hospital, funeral construction site, even if he received advance payment from the injured party due to the disposition that was rejected on March 25, 2015 regarding the permission for the development of land for the purpose of

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, was transferred KRW 30 million to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (F) in the name of C on the same day from the victim.

2. On June 13, 2016, the Defendant of fraud, at a “H” restaurant located in G in Gwangjuyang-si around June 13, 2016, the Defendant should take up two million won of advance payment, if he/she had the right to operate the restaurant, and the Defendant “H” at the “H” restaurant located in G in G in Masan-si, with the termination of the contract period of his/her temporary shop in J. I., and his/her right to operate the restaurant, exceeds another person.

The amount of KRW 14 million has been borne by K and wife L, which is a wife in Korea, so that the correspondence bears 6 million won.

On the other hand, the right to operate the rest area in J will be given to the party who has received the right to operate the rest area.

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, it is unclear whether the M Association to which the defendant belongs can receive a contract with the number of J rests, and even if the M Association or the defendant entered into a contract with the number of snows, the damage is due to the absence of the ability to pay deposit.