손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The plaintiff asserts that the defendant is responsible for paying consolation money for mental suffering of the plaintiff, since he committed a tort that infringes on the marital life with his knowledge that the plaintiff and C are in a marital relationship with C, even though they are in a marital relationship with C.
Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in the statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the plaintiff filed a marriage report on December 30, 1989 and reported a divorce on November 24, 2008. The legal couple who filed a marriage report on September 17, 2018, and the fact that the defendant provided a teaching service from C and 2016 can be acknowledged.
However, comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 13 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the following circumstances, namely, C appears to have talked on the defendant immediately after reporting the marriage with the plaintiff. Nevertheless, it appears that a marriage declaration is due to property issues, not due to the plaintiff, and it is not good that the relationship with the plaintiff is arranged with the plaintiff and that the time would be reached to introduce the defendant to children. On Oct. 8, 2018, C promised on Oct. 8, 2018 to the defendant that "B would not have been married with the plaintiff and the defendant before the end of 2018, as the business procedure of the plaintiff was not completed. However, currently, it seems that C was not liable for damages to the plaintiff and the defendant's each of the above statements that he would not have been able to hear from the plaintiff and the defendant's each of the above statements.