2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff completed the registration of transfer of ownership based on sale as of April 29, 195, Kimcheon-si Branch of the Daegu District Court Kimcheon-dong (hereinafter “G land”). The Plaintiff’s mother H completed the registration of transfer of ownership based on sale as of January 30, 195, under Article 3793 of the same registry office as of March 22, 1984, and as of May 7, 1973, the Plaintiff completed the registration of transfer based on sale as of May 30, 2005, under Article 17629 of the same registry office as of June 30, 2005, and again completed the registration of transfer of ownership based on inheritance as of September 11, 200.

B. The deceased I completed the registration of preservation of ownership as the Daegu District Court Decision 5115 on March 5, 1981 with respect to the land of 4,512 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) that was adjacent to G land, Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si (hereinafter “instant land”).

C. On November 20, 2013, the deceased I died, and the Defendants, who are children, succeeded to the property.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 10, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment are asserted by the plaintiff. The plaintiff occupied the portion of "B" in the attached Form No. 8 through 20, 28 through 35, and 8 in sequence with each point of "B" (hereinafter "B") for not less than 60 years from the Igra zone. Since the prescription period for the acquisition of possession was completed on March 5, 2001 after the lapse of 20 years from March 5, 1981 when the I acquired legal ownership, the defendants are obligated to complete the registration procedure for the transfer of ownership for each share of "B" to the plaintiff.

It is difficult to recognize that the Plaintiff occupied “B” portion for 20 years from March 5, 1981 only with the descriptions of “B” portion, “A” portion 11-6, “A” evidence 13-1-3, and “A” evidence 12-3.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.