However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who has no fixed occupation.

1. Interference with business;

A. (1) On January 1, 2013, the Defendant interfered with the victim C’s business by force, such as: (a) entering the victim C’s “E” in the Busan Fransh-gu, Busan Fransh-gu; (b) without any justifiable reason, and (c) leaving the victim’s “E” without the influence of alcohol; and (d) preventing the customers who find the victim’s disturbance from entering the said area by avoiding the disturbance for about 15 minutes; and (e) obstructing the victim’s marina business by force.

(2) On February 2, 2013, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s marina business by force by force, such as: (a) the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at a location such as the early 17:00 prior to the beginning of February, 2013; (b) the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, required the victim to take a bath to “spacing and opening the same year”; and (c) preventing another customer from calculating a disturbance for about 10 minutes; and (d) prevented the victim from doing so.

B. From January 1, 2013, around 17:00, the Defendant: (1) demanded one illness from the victim F (the 58-year-old)’s “Huser” in the F (the 58-year-old) operation of the F (the Y) of the Busan Geum-gu; and (2) demanded the victim’s wife to stop on the spot; and (3) obstructed the victim’s wife by breaking the victim’s wife, and breaking it into the victim’s wife, the victim’s wife, “Isk, Isk, Iskn, Isk, Isk, Iskn, Isk, Iskn, Iskn’s, Isn’s, Iskn’s, Iskn’s, Iskn’s, Iskn’s, Iskn’s, and “Isk will interfere with the victim’s business by force even if Iskn’s e.g., Isk.”

(2) When the Defendant, on October 2013, went to the same place as that of the first 18:00 and the preceding paragraph, he was under the influence of alcohol, on the ground that the Defendant was “the victim was under the influence of alcohol.”