beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.21 2015고단1422

일반교통방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 30, 2014, the Defendant was participating in the meeting of the “Resolution on the Abolition of Disability Grade System and Activity Assistant 24-hour Dispute Resolution Meeting” held in India in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Seoul, as an assistant to the disabled person’s activities, and around April 30, 2014, the Defendant obstructed the police officers affiliated E of the 2nd Dong-dong Seoul Seoul Seoul Seoul District Police Agency from the seat seat 75-dong, at around 19:14, in order to cut off the electric wheelchairs from the seat seat room at the seat of the 75-dong entrance of the 75-dong Seoul apartment, to move back to the Minister of Health and Welfare by leaving the place of assembly report, thereby blocking the police officers belonging to E of the 2nd Dong-dong Seoul District Police Agency from using the seat seat tag, which is the police gear of the victimized police officer, and deducted the Defendant by putting the brush f, which was cited by the slope F.

In this way, the defendant, in collusion with those who are unable to know their names, has interfered with legitimate duties concerning the suppression of crime and maintenance of order in slope F.

2. On May 1, 2014, from around 15:00 to around 19:00 of the same day, the Defendant was participating in an assembly of “2014 World Labor-Saving Workers Labor-Savings Happing in the 2014 World Labor Group” held at the Seoul square, etc., and from around 17:48 of the same day to around 18:20 of the same day, the Defendant interfered with the traffic of the vehicle by occupying the front wheelchairs in front of the National Human Rights Commission of Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, with the number of people with disabilities who had not been named, together with three lanes of the number of persons with disabilities who had not been named.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with traffic in collusion with the participants in the assembly in the name of the defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on photographic materials of tort;

1. Relevant Article 185 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70 (1) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The order of provisional payment;