However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

At around 21:00 on November 12, 2014, the Defendant threatened the victim C (the 54-year-old) in D office operated by Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government with the victim, with two knife two knife (20 cm in length, 17 cm in each knife), which is a dangerous thing in the kitchen, in the course of having a dispute over the victim's business with the victim, as the problem of the business with the victim, and then put the two knife on the knife and the knife on the knife and the knife on the knife, and threatened the victim with the two knife and the knife as the knife of the victim.”

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. E statements;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area [6-1-6 months] of the crimes of intimidation [6-1-6 months] [decision of the sentence] [6-1-6 months] of the basic area [6-6 months] of the crimes of this case [decision of the sentence] The sentence was determined as per the disposition, comprehensively taking into account all the circumstances shown in the arguments, such as the circumstances and contents of the crimes of this case, the risk of the crimes, the degree of damage, the degree of damage not agreed with the victim, the recognition and reflect