손해배상(기)등
1. The part concerning the claim for nullification of the instant lawsuit is dismissed.
2. The plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed.
3...
1. The following facts may be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each statement in Gap evidence Nos. 2 to 5, 8, 9, and 14, unless there is a dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the whole pleadings:
The defendant establishes and operates a Chigh School under its jurisdiction, and the plaintiff has been working as a fixed-term teacher in C High School from March 201 to March 201.
B. On October 13, 2015, the Defendant publicly announced the following implementation plan for the “Selection Examination for Candidates for Appointment as School Teachers of School Foundations B and B (hereinafter “instant Examination”).
1. The number of persons to be selected, 11 3 1 1 2 12 110 12 10,000 of the total number of persons to be selected in the Korean language science and chemical sports in the selected subjects;
5. The preliminary examination schedule and announcement of successful examinees;
(d) Public announcement on the website B of the Gyeong-do Office of Education of the Gyeong-do and the school foundation B scheduled on February 2, 2016, 100 of the date and time of the announcement of successful examinees who passed the first examination at the place of the announcement of successful examinees; 10:00 of the public announcement on the website B of the school foundation B scheduled on February 2, 2016;
The number of successful candidates shall not exceed the number of persons to be selected for each subject to selection, but the number of successful candidates may not be employed if there is no suitable person.
C. The Plaintiff applied for the Korean language subject in accordance with the foregoing public notice, and the Defendant, on December 5, 2015, conducted the first test among the instant tests, and announced five persons including the Plaintiff as a successful applicant for the first test in the Korean language on January 5, 2016.
The defendant conducted the second examination among the examinations in this case on January 2016, and as a result, the plaintiff was the person who has the highest score in adding up the results of the first and second examinations among the applicants for the Korean language subjects.
E. The Defendant, on January 29, 2016, convened a board of directors for the announcement of the final successful candidates of the instant test (347) but announced the final successful candidates that fall short of the quorum.