When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

In full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, part of the facts charged is revised to the extent that it does not pose a substantial disadvantage to the exercise of the defendant's right of defense

On July 11, 2017, the Defendant, at around 21:00, went away from the victim D, who was faced with the victim of the instant apartment B, and the Defendant, at around 21:00, come to dispute with the victim D, who was living in his/her place of residence, and went away from the victim due to his/her interruption of dialogue and his/her resistance.

In order to prevent the Defendant from recording the victim’s verbal dispute with the Defendant’s mobile phone prior to that time, the Defendant demanded that the victim “to keep the mobile phone in hand, and to have the conversation defective.” However, the victim left three times the part of the victim’s hand, who took the mobile phone with his/her hand, who did not comply with it.

Defendant continued to see the Defendant, and continue to see the Defendant’s ward beack, and “Libk for liquor tax to live.”

“Around the part of the victim’s body, the part of the victim’s body was cut in one arms and the other hand was prevented, and the victim was led to the living room, and the victim was led to the living room, and the victim could not be separated into the leg against the victim’s will.

As a result, the Defendant committed an open top of the climatic salt, tension, open top of the part, and the plekele of the other part, which require approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The fact that the defendant, in the protocol of interrogation of the suspect of the defendant by the prosecution against the defendant, changed the cell phone of the victim, but failed to do so, and got the victim's hand over several times;

Part of the statement, the victim was not on the floor, and the defendant was sitting behind the victim, and divided into the victim's bridge towards the inside of the bridge.

Part stated

1. During the police interrogation protocol against the accused, the victim talks with another person by editing the recording into his/her own favor or making himself/herself talk with him/her.