도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On October 17, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) driving B Mt Motor Vehicles on the roads 243-6, 243-6, Hancheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, under the influence of alcohol content 0.065% in blood alcohol concentration on October 15:30.
2. On October 17, 2015, the Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) expressed that “any person who drives a drinking house on the roads 794-26, 2015, 112 reported to the effect that he was “a person who drives a drinking house” on the roads 794-26, 205, 112, the Defendant, who was requested the police officer D to take a drinking test from the police officer affiliated with the nuclear police station C District of the nuclear police station C District of the nuclear police station of the United States: (b) and expressed that “the person is not a width, not a width, but a person is treated as a criminal; and (c) there is no crime of spawning any spawn; and (d) when the face of the said D is spawn by hand, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the drinking control.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement made to D by the police;
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to prevent damage by sea and damaged vehicles, notification of the results of the drinking driving control, the damaged police officers' form of damage, and the closure of field video images;
1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of punishment (the obstruction of performance of official duties, the choice of imprisonment), and Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the occupation of drinking and the choice of imprisonment);
2. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;
3. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (amended by the Presidential Decree No. 1000, Jan. 1, 2000) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (amended by the Presidential Decree No. 2010, Apr. 2, 2008) (amended by the Presidential Decree No. 2010, Apr. 2, 201) (amended by the Presidential Decree No.