The execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant, from November 21, 2016 to December 23:15, 2016, 23:40 on the same day, on the ground that the victim C’s singing points in the operation of Busan Jin-gu, Busan, does not drink the victim’s alcohol, the Defendant may spawn the brain with the head at the time of head’s smoking points.

“Along with sound,” the victim expressed his desire by avoiding disturbance, and obstructed the victim’s main business affairs.

2. The Defendant demanded from around 00:30 on November 22, 2016 to around 00:40 on the same day that the Defendant would bring alcohol to the victim at the above location, but the victim did not drink but did so. However, the Defendant did so at present.

The victim interfered with the main business of the victim, such as breaking a plaque while speaking, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 314 of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. 집행유예 형법 제 62조 제 1 항 양형의 이유 [ 권고 형의 범위] 업무 방해 > 제 1 유형( 업무 방해) > 감경영역 (1 월 ~8 월) [ 특별 감경 인자] 처벌 불원( 피해 회복을 위한 진지한 노력 포함) [ 선고형의 결정] 같은 피해자를 상대로 하룻밤 동안 두 번에 걸쳐 저지른 위 각 범행은 죄질이 불량한 점, 피해자와 원만히 합의하였던 점, 폭력 성향의 범행들 로 몇 차례 형사처벌을 받은 전력이 있기는 하나, 그러한 범행들 중 벌금형을 넘어서는 형사처벌을 받은 전력은 없는 점, 그 밖에 피고인의 나이, 성 행, 지능과 환경, 범행의 동기, 수단과 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등 기록에 나타난 양형의 조건이 되는 여러 사정을 종합하여 주문과 같이 형을 정한다.