사기등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a maximum of two years and six months, and a short of two years.
Seized evidence 1 or 2 shall be confiscated.
Punishment of the crime
As the total responsibility of the telephone finance fraud organization, the name-free person assumes a false inspection by calls to many unspecified persons, and deceptions that the head of the passbook opened in the name of the victim would withdraw all the deposits deposited in the account to commit a fraud and return them to employees of the Financial Supervisory Service without any fault. The Defendant, upon the instructions of the name-free box, presented a document in the name of the Chairman of the Financial Services Commission that forged him/her in accordance with the instructions of the name-free box, misrepresented his/her employees to the Financial Supervisory Service, and conspired to receive money from victims by performing the role of disclosing the name-free account to the account that was known to the persons who received cash from the victims, or to the persons who notified the names
1. Counterfeiting an official document;
A. On September 9, 2018, the Defendant received 10 copies of the document files under the name of the Chairperson of the Financial Services Commission, “civil petition tracking a financial account,” from a person under his/her name, by e-mail, and printed 10 copies of the document files in C C C C in the e-mail of the same day.
Accordingly, the defendant has forged official documents in collusion with a name-free person for the purpose of uttering.
B. On September 11, 2018, the Defendant sent a document file under the name of the Chairperson of the Financial Services Commission, “civil petition tracking a financial account,” from a person under his/her name, to e-mail, and printed five copies in the trade name non-fac book near the Mapo-gu Seoul Mapopo Station on the same day, and printed five copies in the E Pac book located in the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, on September 14, 2018.
Accordingly, the defendant has forged official documents in collusion with a name-free person for the purpose of uttering.
2. Fraudulent, attempted fraud, or uttering of forged public documents;
A. A. On September 11, 2018, the person who was unable to name the victim F was phoneed to the victim on September 11, 2018 and misrepresented to the G prosecutor’s office of Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor’s Office, and the bank passbook in the name of the victim at the scene of fraud involving H and 150 persons.