The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the lower court in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the instant facts charged was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of free conviction due to violating the logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the status of custodian, embezzlement, intent of unlawful acquisition, and common principal offender in the crime of embezzlement

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.