2. The judgment of the court below was rendered on March 26, 2014 and sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment and 2 months of suspension of execution, and on April 3, 2014, despite the favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant made confession of the crime of this case and recognized his mistake, and that the degree of injury to the victim is minor. However, the crime of this case is an act of arranging sexual traffic by employing foreigners without status of sojourn, causing injury to foreigners in the course of engaging in sexual traffic and damaging the cell phone of damaged women, and its nature is bad; the defendant did not agree with the victim; the defendant did not agree with the victim; the defendant was sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment and 2 months of suspension of execution after the judgment became final and conclusive; although the judgment became final and conclusive on April 3, 2014, the defendant did not appear to have been subject to suspension of execution; considering the fact that sexual traffic brokerage began to block the crime of this case from spreading sound sexual traffic culture and good morals; considering that the defendant's age of sexual traffic is not detrimental to the society and good morals.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.