성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a business owner who operates a marina business with the trade name “C” on the first floor of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B.
1. From December 5, 2016 to December 12, 2016, the Defendant employed female employees, such as D, E, at the said “C” business establishment, and arranged commercial sex acts by allowing female employees to engage in the act of similarity in a way that stimulates female employees into the hands and the hands of the said male sexual organ by receiving KRW 60,00 to KRW 70,00 in return for marina and commercial sex acts from male customers who found the place.
2. From January 10, 2017 to March 13, 2017, the Defendant employed female employees, such as D, at the instant “C” business establishment, and arranged commercial sex acts by allowing female employees to engage in a similar act in a manner that stimulates female employees into damages and injuries of the said male sexual organ by receiving KRW 60,00 to KRW 70,00 in return for the marina and commercial sex acts from male customers who found the place.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against D or E;
1. Each report on investigation;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;
1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense, and selection of imprisonment;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;
1. The first sentence of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. and Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act reflects the confession of the reason for sentencing, the fact that the person did not have the same criminal record but committed a second crime after crackdown, the period and scale of the business, and other various sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, environment, etc.