2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant is divided into his mistake, that some of the victims does not want the punishment of the defendant, and that the defendant does not have the same criminal record.

However, in light of the fact that the nature of the crime of this case is not good, that the victim is majority and most victims have not been harmed or agreed to recover from the damage even though the amount of damage is reasonable, and that the defendant's age, sexual conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, are too unreasonable. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.