2. From among the crimes of this case, the facts that the victim of night structure intrusion larceny does not want punishment, and that the defendant led to confession and reflects that the circumstances favorable to the defendant are already reflected in the judgment of the court below, and the defendant committed the night structure intrusion larceny of this case during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime. The defendant has many criminal records identical to the crime of this case, and the defendant has the same kind of criminal records, and the contents and circumstances of the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and behavior, occupation and family environment, the circumstances and result of the crime of this case, etc., it is not unreasonable for the court below to have excessively neglected punishment.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.