However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 5, 2013, the Defendant, at around 19:00, tried to give credit to the victim D, operated by the victim D in Gwangju Dong-gu, Gwangju, but was refused from the victim.

Defendant 1 was fluorly fluored from the rejection of a brush, and was fluored at the entrance of a brush with a single-use brush, which had been in possession of around 20:00 on the same day, and was fluored into a brush which was fluored at the entrance of a brush.

In the end, the Defendant destroyed the carpet at the entrance of the entrance, which the damaged person uses as a residence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A seizure record and a seizure list;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the occurrence of a fire, investigation report, investigation report (or investigation, etc. by a witness F relative to the witness), investigation report (the details of seizure of the crime tools);

1. Article 164 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 164 of the choice of punishment (Optional to Imprisonment with labor for a period of time);

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the following grounds for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months to 15 years;

2. The sentencing criteria shall not apply inasmuch as a crime is prosecuted before July 1, 2013, in which the effect of the sentencing criteria for a fire-fighting crime takes effect, as it applies.

3. The crime of this case, which was determined to be sentenced, was fireed on the entrance Kapets at the entrance of the inn, using a disposable dog on the ground that the person was refused to be informed of the credit, and the crime is not less severe in light of the motive or circumstances of the crime.

In particular, strict punishment is required because the crime of fire prevention may cause serious danger to public safety and peace and people's lives, bodies, property, etc.

However, the fact that the defendant recognized the crime and is in depth against it, and in fact, the defendant does not have to move into a dominated building.