2. The Defendant, while recognizing the content of the crime from the first instance to the first instance trial, is recovering damage, such as deposit of the damaged money by the account number of the victims of approximately fifty persons.

However, considering these circumstances, it is difficult to view that the first deliberation sentence is unfair because it goes beyond the scope of discretion and is too unreasonable in full view of various circumstances indicated in the column for “reasons for sentencing” of the first deliberation, taking into account the following circumstances: Defendant’s age, sex, environment, health condition, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit. Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.