청구이의
The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following, and thus, this case is quoted pursuant to the main sentence of Article
[This Court’s assertion and evidence presented by the Plaintiff are examined, the first instance judgment is reasonable even if this court continues to be determined. The Plaintiff asserts to the effect that “the claim for the price of goods under the instant payment order was calculated unfairly.” However, on September 6, 2017, the Plaintiff voluntarily acknowledged the fact that the text message exchanged with the Defendant bears the obligation to pay for the goods of KRW 248 million against the Defendant, and the Defendant requested a provisional attachment of KRW 248 million with the claim amount of KRW 200 million on January 2, 2019, and the original copy of the provisional attachment order was delivered to the Plaintiff on January 2, 2019, and the original copy of the instant payment order was delivered to the Plaintiff on February 7, 2019, and the original copy of the instant payment order was delivered to the Plaintiff on April 19, 2015, and the Plaintiff’s claim for the payment of KRW 248 million on the instant real estate was not accepted by the Defendant’s request for a compulsory auction order by the end of KRW 19, 19, supra.