장물취득등
All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal against the Defendants (two years of probation, probation, community service, 240 hours of probation, 2 years of probation, 2 years of probation, 240 hours of probation, 2 years of probation, 240 hours of probation, 240 hours of probation, community service, etc. in October) are too unfasible and unreasonable.
2. In full view of the following facts: (a) the Defendants did not have the previous sentence; (b) the Defendants did not have any record of punishment heavier than the fine; (c) Defendant A had no record of having been sentenced to a fine; (d) the damage of the fraudulent act was restored to the victim; and (e) the Defendants’ age and other matters regarding the sentencing indicated in the records of this case, the lower judgment’s respective punishment against the Defendants is deemed appropriate; and therefore,
3. Accordingly, the prosecutor’s appeal against the Defendants is without merit, and all of the appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.