However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 1, 2013, around 06:35, the Defendant: (a) sent the Defendant to the above bridge, and went off the Defendant on the front of the said apartment, while walking the front door of the patrol vehicle in front of the patrol vehicle, following the Defendant’s 112 report of the fact that the host was locked on the Yong-dong 518-6, Cheongcheon-si, Cheongcheon-si D District Do, which received the notification of 112, the Defendant used the Defendant to walk on the front of the said apartment. However, the Defendant used the Defendant to take the front door of the patrol vehicle without his own house and walk on the front door of the patrol vehicle, and used the Defendant “Ye-si Ha” to walk the face of E one time with his head being taken one time and walked the left kne of E on one occasion.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on photograph description;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation, community service, or Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act (in many cases, it is judged that the defendant is in danger of repeating a crime due to violence);