beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.04.20 2017가합73634

용역비

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 600,000,000 as well as 6% per annum from August 14, 2012 to April 20, 2018 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company running an event agency business.

On June 24, 2014, the Defendant changed the name of the company from Co., Ltd. to its current trade name, as a company engaged in the production of stage equipment related to broadcasting arts and performing arts.

(hereinafter referred to as “Defendant” without distinguishing before and after the change of trade name.

1) In lightyang-si, the Defendant and the Plaintiff agreed to hold the “2012 E event” (hereinafter “instant event”) from May 12, 2012 to August 12, 2012, 2012 in order to promote regional commercial rights, create jobs, create added value, etc. during the D period of 2012, and accordingly, the “2012 E Organizing Committee” (hereinafter “instant Organizing Committee”) on February 1, 2012 shall be deemed to be the “the Organizing Committee”; and in cases where the instant Organizing Committee is jointly referred to, the “Byang-si side” shall be deemed to be the “the Organizing Committee” on February 1, 2012.

(2) On December 12, 201, the Organizing Committee of the instant case: (a) the Defendant, among four companies, including the Defendant, who submitted a price proposal on December 26, 201; (b) the Defendant, who was designated as a priority negotiation subject, entered into a contract with the Defendant to exercise F performance-related events in the instant event on December 29, 201 (Evidence A; hereinafter “the initial agency service contract of the instant case”) under which the Defendant entered into an agreement to exercise overall tasks, including planning, progress of events, interference with human resources, and establishment of related facilities, on behalf of the Defendant during the instant event (Evidence A; hereinafter “instant agency service contract”). The main contents are as follows.

In relation to the exercise of this case, the plaintiff and the defendant enter into an event agency contract in relation to the original agency contract of this case as follows.

Article 2 (Opening of Events)

1. The name of event: 2012 E;

2. Period for exercise: From May 12, 2012 to August 12, 2012 (93 days)

3. Contract period: From the contract date to the day when the settlement of accounts expires;

5. Content of the event - Official performances, official events (outstandings, openings, closeds), permanent cultural events;