However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 15, 2019, the Defendant, at around 03:50 on February 15, 2019, tried to enter the entrance to the entrance with the victim C (the 47-year old age) at the front of the Suwon-gu Babel on the ground that he was refused to do so. On the other hand, the Defendant assaulted the victim, such as the victim's face, face, arms, etc., to have the victim go beyond the floor in consideration of the victim's face by drinking, followed again, thereby causing damage to the character of the other parts necessary for medical treatment for about 15 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Detailed statement of handling each 112 Reporting Cases;

1. On-site photographs and victim photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The fact that the community service order had been punished several times for the same offense as the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is disadvantageous.

However, the punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of the fact that the victim was not punished for the defendant, the fact that the victim was not punished for the defendant, the fact that the mistake was committed against the defendant, and other sentencing conditions in the records, such as the age, character, conduct and environment of the defendant, etc.