If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

The defendant is a public official in the class I of the visually disabled, and the victim D(1910ssss) is a person who prepared for the operation of the aquatic plant in around 197 and became aware of the introduction of the person.

1. At around 11:00 on September 15, 201, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) viewed the damage of the victim during the preparation for the operation of the water supply plant in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Etel, which was operated by the victim; and (b) talks with the victim’s right to attend a large amount of 10 years ago; and (c) talks with the victim’s “if he/she does not know the money, he/she would die as the victim.” (d) Although the head of the office of the office of the management of the above officetels and the employees of the above office of sales, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s sales business by force, such as interfering with the business of the above office and noise of the victim at the above office for about 40 minutes; (b) even though the Defendant was unable to move out of the above office, the Defendant did not request the victim to return the money from the victim’s children and the victim’s children to the 10th of the visually disabled at around October 120, 20100.

The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness K, G, and F;

1. Each police statement made to K, G, and F;

1. Detailed statement of handling each 112 Reporting Cases;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 314 (1) and 319 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;