2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court below, i.e., victims, at the court of the court below, have assaulted themselves as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment below.

In light of the facts stated in the judgment below, the defendant first stated that "the victim D sought to see himself/herself by taking advantage of the file movement organization, and the victim E toldd D," but the victim E was tried to undergo a physiological examination, and the defendant changed his/her statement that " he/she first taken the file movement organization other than the victim D," (see, e.g., 136 pages and 165 of the evidence record)", it is sufficiently recognized that the defendant assaulted the victims as stated in the facts charged in the judgment of the court below.

B. Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.