2. The Defendants led to the confession of the instant crime and the mistake against the Defendants, and the Defendants reached an agreement with the victim J, P, and the victim E’s damage was entirely returned, etc. are considered favorable to the Defendants.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendants on the one hand or several occasions, and the defendant Gap committed an assault against the victim F without any justifiable reason in light of the method, content, frequency, result, etc. of the crime. The crime of this case is committed by larceny or violence; the defendant Eul has a strong history of being sentenced to criminal punishment several times, including the punishment due to the crime of larceny; the defendant Eul committed an attempted murder; the defendant Eul committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that the defendant C committed an attempted murder; and the defendant C committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime; and all of the sentencing conditions in the argument of this case, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant Eul's assertion of unfair sentencing

3. As such, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.