beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.02.08 2015고단1226

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동감금)

Text

Defendant

E shall be punished by a fine of 50,000 won.

Defendant

If E does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants have obstructed construction at the construction site due to the following reasons: (a) the Defendants were living in the vicinity of the G construction site performed by the Korea Electric Power Corporation; (b) the value of the ground created by the steel tower; (c) the likelihood of undermining the farming industry; and (d) the occurrence of health problems.

1. On August 17, 2015, Defendants of the joint crime committed by the Defendants discovered that the access road to the construction site was occupied by other residents opposing the construction work site at H around 08:50 on August 17, 2015, and the construction has been obstructed by Han Electric Power Staff and the members of the construction site from entering the construction site. Defendant A was in compliance with this situation of the Victim J (56) I of the Korea Electric Power Corporation. Defendant A was unable to stop from leaving the vehicle due to the defect that the victim is about to get out of the vehicle due to the vehicle’s body being faced by the vehicle. Defendant C was able to leave the vehicle around the vehicle and brought the vehicle into the vehicle, and Defendant C was able to look around the surrounding area of the vehicle, and prevented from leaving the vehicle from leaving the vehicle due to the vehicle’s appearance, and Defendant C was able to prevent the vehicle from leaving the vehicle due to the vehicle’s appearance and the vehicle from leaving the surrounding area of the vehicle.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly detained the victim.

2. At around 08:50 on August 17, 2015, the Defendant destroyed the said car with the repair cost of KRW 7,206,729 for the following reasons: (a) Defendant 3 was on board the KS5 car owned by the Korea Electric Power Corporation owned by the victim, who suffered damage to J residents; (b) Defendant 3 was on board the said car; (c) due to the defect in the glass and painting on the ridge between the said vehicle and the ridges after the driver’s seat; and (d) Defendant damaged the said car.

Summary of Evidence

1..