2. After an appeal is filed.

The reasoning for this part is as follows. The court shall use “07-06” as “07-03” in the table of No. 4(c) of the judgment of the first instance as “07-03,” and the “day of hospitalization” in No. 3 as “injury 20,000” is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance except for adding “injury 20,000” to the upper end of the judgment, and this part of the judgment shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. The reasoning for this part of the plaintiff’s assertion is as follows, except for the first instance judgment No. 5, No. 12 through No. 15, the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance is as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. Even if the insurance contract of this case is not invalidated, the defendant has a duty to additionally write it out from the judgment of the second instance court’s “20 days of admission or preliminary injury or disease received for a long time.”

The plaintiff's primary argument (whether the insurance contract of this case is null and void) has been filed with "The Court of First Instance 13" and "The Court of Second Instance" has been filed with "the Court of First Instance 14". As a result of the inquiry into the facts of "The Court of First Instance 14", "the following" and "the Korean Compensation Medical Association of the High Court of Justice".