특수폭행
Defendant
The sentence of sentence against A shall be suspended.
Defendant
Each indictment against B and C shall be dismissed.
around September 11:15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) collected concrete bricks in front of Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu (51) from the victim C (the 51 year old) in front of the store operation issues; (b) applied a concrete brick in the city Do, and acted as if he had the face of the victim; and (c) carried with him a dangerous object, such as flabing flading flab, etc. of the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to C of a protocol concerning suspect interrogation of the police;
1. Relevant Article 261 of the Criminal Act, Articles 261 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for criminal facts, and the selection of fines;
1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;
1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da15488, Apr. 2, 2009) (see, 2009Da1248, Apr. 2, 2009))
1. Summary of the facts charged
A. On September 6, 2016, Defendant B: (a) 11:15 on September 6, 2016, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s C’s satisf by sating the bat at the front of Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, by satisfing the batf of the victim’s C; (b) deducted the victim’s inner diameter on the ground that the victim F (e.g., 42 years of age) was prevented; and (c) threatened the victim F with the victim
B. Defendant C, at the same time and place, and as indicated in the facts constituting the crime as seen earlier with the victim A (53 tax), committed assault against the victim, such as duplicating the victim’s bomb by hand.
2. The facts charged against Defendant B are crimes falling under Articles 260(1) and 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and the facts charged against Defendant C are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Articles 260(3) and 283(3) of the Criminal Act.
The victim C, F, and A shall be the subject of this case.