임대차보증금반환
1. The defendant shall pay KRW 120,000 to the plaintiff.
2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
3.Paragraph 1.
On June 2, 2012, the Plaintiff leased the Seongbuk-gu Seoul 2nd Group C2 from the Defendant to July 12, 2014, the lease deposit amount of KRW 120 million from July 13, 2012 to July 12, 2014. The Plaintiff paid the above lease deposit amount of KRW 120 million to the Defendant is not disputed between the parties, or it may be recognized by taking into account the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement in subparagraphs 1 and 2, and there is no reflective evidence.
There is no evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff, at the time of the conclusion of the above lease agreement, made a verbal agreement to refund the lease deposit directly to a new lessee.
As long as the above lease contract has expired on July 12, 2014 (if it was explicitly renewed as the Defendant’s assertion, it is apparent that three months have elapsed since the copy of the complaint of this case containing the purport of terminating the contract of this case was served on the Defendant on August 14, 2014, and the above lease contract was terminated on November 15, 2014), the Defendant is obligated to return the lease deposit amount of KRW 120 million to the Plaintiff.