However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From June 2, 2011 to June 15, 2011, the Defendant established and operated 50 new-purpose game machines from “D” located in Daegu Northern-gu C.

Although the above "New-Pking" game was rated as pure ability game with a pure ability game that customers use, locking, locked, and do not locked on the screen, and if locked, she obtained scores by cutting off the relative locking on the screen, the defendant provided the game automatically by moving the game screen to the right side, regardless of the ability and ability of customers, and the game screen is automatically carried out, regardless of the number of customers, and if she appeared on the screen, 10,000 won and 90,000 won and 10,000,000 won and 30,000,000 won and 30,000,000 won, depending on the type of the game, if she appeared on the screen.

As such, the Defendant provided game products, the contents of which are different from the game products classified, for use.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of E, F and G;

1. Some of the interrogation records of the accused by the prosecution;

1. E prosecutorial statement;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Game description;

1. Each reply on the results of enforcement support;

1. An investigation report (attaching a written opinion on similar cases);

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a letter of request for cooperation with investigation;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, subparagraph 4 of Article 45 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Selection of Game Industry Promotion, and Selection of Imprisonment with labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (including the size and period of business, and points without the same electricity);

1. Order of community service;