When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2014. 12. 14. 22:20경 서울 광진구 C에 있는 ‘D식당’에서 ‘주취자가 시비 후 자고 있다’는 112신고를 받고 출동한 서울광진경찰서 E지구대 소속 경장 F으로부터 귀가를 종용받자, F에게 “야이 새끼들아 니들이 뭔데, 니 갈길이나 가, 야이 짭새들아”라고 욕설하며 얼굴과 가슴으로 F을 수회 밀쳐 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (Hearing statements by shots);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of a selective fine (i.e., a relatively minor, the fact that violence is relatively minor, the fact that there is a physical disability5, the fact that there is no record of punishment, other than twice a fine concerning violence before 2005 and that there is no record of suspended execution, and the fact that security guards can lose their workplace due to being sentenced to suspended execution or more);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;