beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.04.21 2016고정14

공중위생관리법위반등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 800,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 High 14"

1. Any person who intends to conduct public sanitary business shall be equipped with facilities and equipment prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry for Health and Welfare for each type of public sanitary business and shall report to the head of a Si/Gun/Gu;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without reporting to the Seopo City Mayor, conducted public sanitary business, such as providing guest rooms, in a house located in Seopo City D from March 2008 to October 15, 2015, from April 27, 2009 to October 15, 2015, in a house located in E from April 27, 2009 to March 15, 2015, and from March 2012 to October 15, 2015, in a restaurant operated by the Defendant of F, from March 2012 to October 15, 2015.

"2016 High 224"

2. The Defendant is an auditor of H village in Seopopopopoposi, and the victim I (54) is the head of H village.

On October 1, 2015, the Defendant found in the H office located in the Sinpo CityJ around 10:00, and she operated the minutes of the village general meeting and took a bath to the victim, and assaulted the victim by pushing the victim's chest with his/her finger hand.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 High 14"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to K and I;

1. "Investigation report (Attachment of on-site photographs, business reports, documents, etc. related to business reports)" 2016 Goo 224;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to I and L;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the relevant criminal facts, Articles 20(1)1 and 3(1) (unreported public sanitary business) of the Public Health Control Act, Article 260(1) (a) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The fact that the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of the Provisional Payment Order is longer the period for which the defendant did not engage in the reported public hygiene business, and that the victim of the assault wishes to punish the defendant is disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, the defendant has led to the confession of all of the crimes of this case.