(a)be as shown in the attachment of the claim;

(b) Judgment based on the recommendation of confession based on the basis of recognition (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant C

A. The facts of recognition) Defendant C, as a doctor, received a loan from the Government for policy steps to reinforce the functions of medical institutions, prepared construction costs to build a convalescent hospital on the land and 2 lots owned by Nonparty D, concluded a sales contract with D owner at KRW 1 billion, and waived the construction of the above convalescent hospital as it did not receive the above policy funds loan around September 15, 2006, but gave up the construction of the above convalescent hospital as it did not receive the above policy funds loan around February 2007. Accordingly, D would have established a convalescent hospital with F and the same business, and F would have concluded a new construction contract with the Plaintiff on April 10, 2007 with the owner of the above government office at KRW 2.3 billion, but it did not participate in the construction of the hospital at the end of August 2007 with D and the owner of the above project at the end of August 208, 2007.

However, the facts are that Defendant C is only the person who is the name of the building permit as above, and Defendant B is merely the actual operator of the Si Corporation, so the Plaintiff is a corporation director after the completion of the hospital.