2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 5, 2014, at around 04:00, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by openly speaking, “Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre,

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In addition, even though the police officer’s desire to commit the instant crime on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and had the record of suspended execution due to the same crime (such as obstruction of performance of official duties, etc.), the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime of a similar type, which is disadvantageous to others, should be considered in favor of others, and the fact that the Defendant seriously reflects on the Defendant’s age, occupation, environment, circumstances of the instant crime, details, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence was determined as ordered by considering the sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act.