However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2019. 7. 12. 22:40경 서울 영등포구 B에 있는 C병원 앞 노상에서, ‘취객이 택시비를 주지 않고 택시기사의 멱살을 잡고 욕을 한다’는 내용의 112신고 전화를 받고 출동한 서울영등포경찰서 D파출소 소속 경장 E으로부터 택시비를 지불하고 귀가할 것을 요구받자, “총으로 쏴 죽여 버린다”라는 등으로 말하면서 위 E의 어깨 부위를 손으로 잡아당기고 팔 부위를 손으로 2회 때려 폭행하고, 이를 제지하는 순경 F의 몸을 어깨 등으로 수회 밀쳐 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officials on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to F and E;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the investigative report;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, based on the suspended sentence, comprehensively considered all the circumstances favorable or unfavorable to the defendant as shown in the pleadings, such as the criminal records up to the transfer of the instant case, the age, career, health status, family relation, etc.