2. Determination

A. The argument that the prosecutor asserts that the defendant was pushed off the D's shoulder with his hand, as shown in the facts charged, and the defendant's side is arguing that D's chest was pushed down with the defendant's chest and talked with D's stairs, etc., and he was friendly with D's finger, and that D's finger is a body of the floor.

B. According to the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence adopted by the court of this review and investigated by this court, i.e., ① the fact that the defendant exceeded D, ② the defendant was on the job at the time of the transfer of D, ③ the defendant was also aware of the fact that there was a dispute with D, ④ the defendant's statement that the defendant was close to the defendant, and ④ the defendant's statement that the defendant was close to the defendant, there is no probability that the defendant exceeded D.

However, the following opposing circumstances acknowledged by the evidence adopted and examined by this court, i.e., (i) whether the defendant was sealed in her hand, (ii) whether the defendant was sealed in her hand, and (iii) whether the defendant was sealed in her hand, and (iv) when the testimony was made in this court, she did not memory about this part. (ii) At the time, the defendant was cleaning the water by her boom [the floor was slick because the Defendant was under cleaning the water by her hand. (iii) At that time, the floor was slick.