A. The facts of recognition are as follows: (a) evidence No. 1-1 (a) (a certificate of rent, and a joint and several surety) of the defendant’s name is presumed to be the authenticity of the entire document because the seal attached to the defendant’s name is not in dispute over the defendant’s painting; (b) according to the overall purport of the entries and arguments in the evidence No. 2, No. 3, and No. 2, and No. 2; and (c) according to the whole purport of the arguments and arguments, the plaintiff set the amount of KRW 52 million on May 13, 2009 to C on August 31, 2009 and the interest rate of 2% (24% per annum); and (c) the defendant may recognize the fact that he/she jointly and severally

B. On the other hand, the judgment on the alteration of forgerys is made. On the other hand, the Defendant: (a) organized the legal relationship of the Republic of Korea budget group D and six parcels owned by the Defendant and sold the above land; (b) sold the Defendant’s seal impression and a certificate of seal impression; (c) at his own discretion, C affixed a seal impression on the Defendant’s name and next to the above loan certificate (No. 1-1).

In other words, on April 29, 2009, prior to the preparation of the above loan certificate, the Plaintiff issued directly by the Defendant on April 29, 2009 the Defendant’s certificate of the personal seal impression on the following circumstances, which can be acknowledged by the purport of the statement and the whole argument as to Gap evidence Nos. 1-3 and Eul evidence Nos. 1-3, and the above loan certificate. On September 14, 2012, the Plaintiff received a provisional attachment decision (2012Kadan961) on the four real estate owned by the Defendant from the Hongsung Branch Branch of Daejeon District Court (2012Kadan961). The Defendant was aware of this, and the Defendant did not take any measures for two years. According to the Defendant’s assertion, the amount of the loan and the amount of the joint and several surety debt, including the above loan certificate, to the Defendant by stealing borrowed money from the Plaintiff or E, exceeds KRW 300,000,000,000.