However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 15, 2016, the Defendant who committed the crime against the victim C was the mother (parent) of the Defendant’s apartment 8 Dong 203, Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, about 17:00, and at the home of C, the Defendant broken the victim’s son on the ground that the Defendant had made telephone conversations with the father of the Defendant with the former husband’s interest on the ground that the Defendant was delayed due to telephone conversations with the father of the Defendant, and caused the Defendant to the late time at home. In addition, the Defendant broken the victim’s son’s disease worth KRW 2,00,00, a market price owned by the victim who was on his/her own deposit.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

2. Crimes against victims E;

A. The Defendant injured by interference with the performance of special official duties at the time, place, and at the place specified in the above paragraph 1 above, the Defendant opened a string door and opened the string door which is a dangerous article (30 cm in total length, 16 cm in length) of the victim E, who is a private police box belonging to the Daegu Suhyup Police Station F Police Station F box called upon upon receiving the above report from the above C, who takes the beginning of the house of the above paragraph 1, and who is in the place where the victim E takes a knife of the dangerous article in the kitchen.

In the same manner, the police knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife the defendant's arms, knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife kn

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention and investigation of crimes, and the handling of reported cases, and thereby suffered injury to the victim.

B. The Defendant damaged property at the time, place, and at the same time and place as described in paragraph 1 above, when she takes the face of the Victim E, who was wearing a warning as described in Paragraph 2(a) above, twice as drinking, he saw the victim’s face, and he saw the victim’s face 130,000 won at the market price, which is the victim’s own.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E, C.