However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, with a bad credit relationship, thought that the lending company would not receive a loan from the lending company under the name of the Defendant, was able to receive a loan in the name of the Defendant.

Around November 14, 2007, the Defendant prepared a loan application in the name of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, stating that he had been employed by employees in the name of the victim waland, and then sent the application by mail, accompanied by a copy of the resident registration certificate in the name of C, a copy of the medical insurance certificate, a certificate of personal seal impression, and a copy or abstract of the resident registration certificate.

However, in order to obtain a loan under C’s name, the Defendant possessed a resident registration certificate or medical insurance certificate of C, and obtained a certificate of personal seal impression and a certified copy or abstract of C’s resident registration in the Geum-dong Office at the time of the strike, using it, and there is no particular property or income, while the Defendant could not receive a loan under his/her name due to a bad credit relationship, and thus, he/she did not have any intent or ability to repay the loan even if he

Nevertheless, on November 14, 2007, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 2 million won from the victim to the corporate bank account in the name of C as a loan from the victim and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution (including a substitution withC);

1. C’s statement of police;

1. Loan documents, including an application for loan;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to issue certificates of seal imprint;

1. Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution [Scope of Recommendation]: General fraud (less than KRW 100 million) and basic area (under six to one year and six months): Reduction element where punishment is not granted or where damage has been recovered from a considerable part: Aggravating element where the number of crimes is very poor or the court commits fraud in a trial procedure.