However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

On April 1, 2015, at around 03:00, the Defendant: (a) entered a police box located in D, and without any justifiable reason, went into the said police box; (b) transferred the police box to a police officer, such as a policeman F, who belongs to the relevant police box; and (c) “I am out of the police box, and immediately left the police box.”

h. Cypileia

6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.3 6.2 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.4 6.

In order to hear the word “F”, as it threatens F to see the said F due to her hand while speaking “I am missing,” and at the same time the left face part of the said F, the victim F(23 years of age) was damaged to the left part of the said F, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties of police officers on duty in the military, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Statement of each police statement concerning F;

1. A medical certificate of injury to F and a written result of autopsy of the dead body;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of a copy of the patrol box) (a copy of the duty site), investigation report (up to the suspect’s speech and behavior immediately after taking the custody), investigation report (up to the time shown by CCTV), investigation report (up to CCTV photographs containing the face of the suspect’s assault), application of statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Punishment provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for ordinary concurrences and selective punishment (the punishment heavier than that provided for in the crime of bodily injury shall be punished, but choice of imprisonment shall be imposed);

1. Although Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution enters a police box without any justifiable reason, the crime committed against a police officer is of poor quality, the injury of the victim is relatively minor, the defendant reflects his behavior late after the crime, and the defendant is liable for damages in future.