소유권이전등기
1. The defendant's each point of the attached reference indicated in the attached Form 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 1 among the land of 129 square meters in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si.
1. The following facts are found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the contents and images of Gap evidence 1 to 10 (including paper numbers) and the purport of the entire pleadings as a result of the appraiser C’s appraisal:
A. The Plaintiff’s husband’s husband D completed the registration of ownership transfer on September 30, 1980 with respect to the 387 square meters in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, on the ground of sale and purchase on March 15, 1966, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on September 30, 1980 with respect to F large 248 square meters, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on December 18, 1985 with respect to the 1,583 square meters in G on December 18, 1985. < Amended by Act No. 3792, Dec. 23, 1985>
B. Of the [Attachment Reference] No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 1, the part (a) in the ship (hereinafter “instant land”) connected with each point of the attached Table No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 118 square meters in order
Since December 18, 1985, the network D occupied the land of this case and died on December 23, 1997. Since then, the Plaintiff used the land of this case as the former (congo, maize, etc.) and occupied it until now.
2. According to the above findings of the determination as to the cause of the claim, it is recognized that the deceased D occupied the land from December 18, 1985 to December 23, 1997, and thereafter, the plaintiff, the inheritor, from that time, possessed the land. Since each of the above possession is presumed to be possession in peace and public performance based on the intention of ownership, barring any special circumstance, the plaintiff's prescriptive acquisition as to the land of this case was completed on December 18, 1985 after the lapse of 20 years from December 18, 1985.
(The Plaintiff asserted the prescriptive acquisition of the entire 129 square meters in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, but there is no evidence to acknowledge that the network D and the Plaintiff possessed or occupied the remainder other than the instant land. This part of the claim is without merit). For this, the Defendant is simple in accordance with the Act on Special Measures for the Registration of Real Estate concerning the Registration of Real Estate with respect to the 387 square meters and F large scale 248 square meters located around the instant land.