If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. A thief: (a) around August 8, 2016, the Defendant: (b) reported to, and entered into, the store any advertising phrase that provides pro rata, even with only counseling counseling from D located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu Seoul; and (c) to, E who is an employee of the place.

After being asked as "N", E promptly stolen the answer as "N," and immediately stolen an amount equivalent to KRW 1,300,000, the market price of the Masan, which is the owner of the victim's name or non-fluence.

2. The Defendant assaulted the victim’s arms and parts of the victim’s knife with 20 knife, knife with knife with knife, knife with knife with knife, knife with knife with knife, knife with knife with knife, knife with knife with knife.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act (abstinance, choice of fines) and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (abstinence, choice of fines) concerning criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;