2. The facts that the Defendant led to the instant crime, such as the confession of the instant crime and reflects the mistake, and that the Defendant appears to have led to the instant crime, considering the fact that the Defendant was economically imminent, is considered favorable to the Defendant.

However, in light of the following: (a) the crime of this case committed by the Defendant was committed at night by taking the correction device into the upper spot, or attempted to steals or steals property worth KRW 76 million over 126 times during about 2 years and 4 months; (b) the nature of the crime is very poor in light of the method, frequency, and degree of damage; (c) the Defendant has a record of criminal punishment for the same crime; (d) the Defendant has not yet recovered from damage; and (e) the Defendant has not yet recovered from damage; and (e) other various sentencing conditions in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and family environment, it is not recognized that the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.